šŸ€ The Closest Final Four in 20 Years

Which underdogs have value, and does the dome actually affect shooting?

The Final Four always delivers. This weekend should be no different.

Before we get into the picks, it is worth remembering what this stage of the tournament actually means historically, because the Final Four has a way of producing moments that outlast everything else in the sport.

It’s hard to choose where to start but let’s go with the 1985 national championship game. Villanova shot 78.6% from the field against a Patrick Ewing-led Georgetown team that was defending its title and was not supposed to lose to anyone, let alone an 8-seed. That shooting percentage remains an NCAA championship game record, and the Wildcats still only won by two points.

In 2006, George Mason erased a double-digit deficit against a UConn roster loaded with future NBA talent and went on to win in Overtime. While not exactly Final Four, it meant George Mason would reach the 2006 Final Four, a significant accomplishment for the 11-seed. This tournament run paved the way for future Cinderella stories in the modern era.

The 2010 championship was full of drama. With the clock expiring, Gordon Hayward put up a half-court heave that bounced off the backboard, rim and out. Most people who watched it still believe Butler should have won the national championship over Duke that year.

Then there is Jalen Suggs in 2021, taking an inbounds pass, crossing half-court, and banking in a 40-foot shot at the buzzer to keep Gonzaga's perfect season alive by beating UCLA. It was the first buzzer-beater in a Final Four game since 1985.

This weekend features two compelling games. We have to go back to 2008 to find a Final Four where both games had favorites of less than 3 points. Michigan and Arizona is being called the real national championship while UConn and Illinois is a rematch between teams that have already played a memorable game this season.

Preparation matters here more than talent, when the margin between the right side and the wrong side of history is routinely measured in single possessions. With two close games expected, let’s hope for more memorable moments like these.

šŸ”„ Your Betting Research Just Got Supercharged

Live odds. Parlay breakdowns. Deep stat analysis. Jaxon does it all right from your phone, in seconds. No more browser tabs, no more guessing, no more wasted time. Just ask Jaxon and get to work.

This is the tool serious bettors have been waiting for, and it's live right now on iOS and Android.

šŸ€ Final Four Valuable ā€˜Underdogs’

For a tournament that’s had a lot of chalk, we effectively have two coin flips ahead of us in the Final Four. Let’s take a look at where the value lies this weekend.

UConn Moneyline (+110)

The Huskies are the only school in the nation that spend more money on their basketball program than they do on football. Makes sense when you realize either their men or women (or both) have made the final four every year since 2008. Ridiculous.

Illinois has been one of the most dominant teams in the country all season. Their offense is ranked third nationally in offensive rebounding rate, which means missed shots functionally become extra possessions. Their last three opponents were held under 60 points which shows you can’t afford to miss chances against them.

The problem for Illinois is that UConn has already beaten them once this season, 74-61, and did it largely by winning the rebounding battle. By limiting the Illini to one shot per possession they remove the second-chance engine that powers their offense.

UConn also held Illinois to 6-of-29 from three in that first meeting. Illinois takes nearly half their shots from beyond the arc and need better than a 21% make percentage if they want to win. If that pattern repeats itself at Lucas Oil, the Huskies' interior efficiency can carry them through. UConn at plus money against a team they have already beaten this season is as straightforward as it gets.

Arizona Moneyline (+111)

Michigan is an elite offensive team and the statistical case for them reaching the national championship game is real. Their offense ranks fourth nationally in efficiency, and when they shoot 40% or better from three, they are nearly impossible to beat. The issue is what happens when they don’t.

In Michigan's three losses this season they shot a combined 28.4% from deep. Arizona ranks 9th in limiting catch-and-shoot opportunities and is in the 99th percentile defensively when those looks are contested. Michigan lives in the 99th percentile when those same shots are open.

A concern worth noting is that Michigan's transition defense numbers look impressive, but their Big Ten slate featured very few genuinely fast-paced opponents. Arizona plays at a pace and pressure level the Wolverines have not consistently faced this season.

Michigan is a popular pick, but Arizona at plus money is my preference.

 šŸŒ² The Pine Line

šŸˆ Alabama’s own AD just called for the end of conference championship games. He probably won’t be the last one to say it.

šŸ’ Following last night’s loss, the Canucks might finally win something. They’re racing towards the wrong end of the leaderboard.

šŸŽļø Drivers are dealing with the F1 schedule gap differently. Some just can’t seem to stay out of the driver’s seat.

🄊 The Pacquiao-Mayweather rematch might be in trouble. De La Hoya might be in the fight after his recent comments.

šŸ’Æ Some players are hitting their props every night. The streaks, projections, and best odds are all in one place.

šŸ€ Does the Dome Really Matter? Final Four Betting Breakdown and Four Player Props

by Ed Egros šŸ‘‰ļø Follow on X @EdWithSports

Unlike most NCAA Tournament games, the Final Four is played at a football stadium.  That means more fans, an elevated court and altered shooting depth perception.  

Why It Matters

Because fans are so far away from the court, there’s no background behind the basket.  As college basketball data scientist Ken Pomeroy put it, shooters tend to shoot worse because they’re not used to it.

However, other studies suggest there’s no evidence of a ā€œdome effectā€ where overall scoring goes down substantially.  Even if players and coaches complain their shooting goes down, it may also have to do with the defense they’re playing, the magnitude of the game and the grind of the season.

What History Says

Covers has recorded every spread and total from the Final Four since 1985.  Specifically in semifinal games, unders are 38-32-4.  However, since 1997 when the Final Four permanently moved these games to domes, unders are 27-26-3.  Either the market has already adjusted or we’ve overblown the football stadium thing for too long.

Offense Might Overcome Regardless

Four of the top adjusted offensive efficiencies will be on display in Indianapolis Saturday night.  And specifically in the game pitting Michigan against Arizona, we’ll see two of the faster teams in the country, meaning they might find an open shot quickly or score a lot in transition. 

Using Jaxon’s AI tools, let’s see if we can find edges specifically in the player prop market:

Koa Peat (Arizona) O2.5 Assists on Underdog (1.04x)

At 6’8ā€, it seems like this forward would be known more for scoring inside.  However, this season Koa Peat has earned a 17.2% assist rate, third highest for the Wildcats.  

Michigan’s defense loves swarming around the ball, so Peat may naturally need to be a distributor more than usual.

Lastly, in this tournament Peat has earned multiple assists in three of four games.  2.5 may seem high, but you’re getting plus-money and, again, a faster game with more possessions.  Expect Peat to have at least three assists.

Keaton Wagler (Illinois) O1.5 Three-Pointers Made on PrizePicks

If offensive efficiency will overcome any ā€œdome effectā€, we should feel comfortable betting this prop.

Keaton Wagler has a usage rate of 25.6%, which is second highest on the team.  He’s attempted more than 200 triples this season, 50 more than any other member of the Illini.  Wagler makes more than 40% of his three-point attempts and, against a defense that may prioritize stopping interior threats, may get even more open looks than usual.

Illinois head coach Brad Underwood often gives Wagler a lot of minutes and Wagler has done his part frequently this season.  Wagler should sink at least two shots from long distance.

Who do you want to win the National Title?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

šŸ§€ Stay Sharp 

Don't head into tonight’s action without an edge. Ask Jaxon for insights on iOS or Android šŸ‘‡ļø